Canadian wildfires have grabbed lots of headlines recently, but as usual, the press is reporting standard lies and baseless climate change hysteria. Here are the undisputed facts.
Anybody with eyes can see the obvious decline over the past several decades, but the fake media does everything it can to “hide the decline” just as Michael Mann plotted, planned, and secretly did in his infamous and totally debunked 1998 “hockey stick” piece of garbage math and science.
That’s the global picture, here’s Canada:
Again, the decline both in number of fires AND acreage burned is quite obvious over the last 30+ years — at least to anyone whose eyes are open.
And, the vast majority (around 80%) of the fires are human caused with a startling and recent massive change that has lead to human-caused fires also accounting for the vast majority of acreage burned as well. In the past, the vast majority of acreage burned was caused by lightning strikes and other natural causes. Not so anymore. Hmmm? No conspiracy theories here.
Furthermore, as renowned researcher Roger Pielke Jr. notes, the current burn rates in Canada over the last several decades are “much lower than in centuries past” going back to the 1700s.
Even the left-wing governmental propaganda organization run by the United Nations known as the IPCC doesn’t attempt to tie global wildfires to climate change. In the most recent IPCC tome known as AR6, the best propaganda they could muster was,
“There is medium confidence [about as likely as not] that weather conditions that promote wildfires have become more probable in southern Europe, northern Eurasia, the USA, and Australia over the last century. In Australia a number of event attribution studies show that there is medium confidence of increase in fire weather conditions due to human influence.” [emphasis added]
Indeed, there is no attribution of changes in global wildfire numbers or acreage anywhere to be found in AR6. Regionally, and notably NOT including anywhere in Canada. There are some regional areas where they believe that climate change has had limited influence, but they are not very sure about anything. Note that their “medium confidence” prognostications are, according to them, just as likely false as true.
None of these inconvenient facts will stop the climate change extremists and their co-propagandists throughout the media and the world of so-called climate scientists. Indeed you’ll have a hard time trying to find these facts mentioned anywhere there, and that’s why we publish them here at climatethetruth.com.
ClimateTheTruth.com 